By 2004, Ansell had already
launched the Ansell Cytostatic Permeation Program (ACPP). This
permeation assessment protocol
has resulted in safer guidelines for
handling highcrisk chemicals, such
as drugs used in chemotherapy.
With Ansell’s newly introduced
and exclusive AVPP testing programme, a similar ‘dynamic’
methodology is applied in order to
measure potential viral
penetration through medical gloves
and provide better protection for
healthcare professionals. The AVPP
uses the Ansell Dynamic Testing
Device (Ansell exclusivity) , which
simulates the realclife, dynamic
situations such as rubbing, stress,
exposure and the tension that medical gloves endure in daily work
manipulations. The result is a far
more accurate evaluation of glove
resistance to viral penetration.
The AVPP is the result of the collaboration between the Université
Catholique de Louvain’s department of toxicology and special chemistry, their virology lab and
Ansell Europe’s medical business group.
We have assessed the resistance of
Ansell’s surgical or examination
gloves to dynamic penetration
by bloodcborne pathogens, using
the Phi-X174 bacteriophage as
a surrogate and noncpathogenic
microcorganism to simulate
pathogenic viruses. The diameter
of this bacteriophage is much
smaller than HIV, HBV or HCV
viruses. This surrogate is the
same bacteriophage as used for
the ASTM F1671-07 standard. The
virus concentration in cultures
that are in contact with gloves and
the measuring methods of viral
penetration are also the same as
for the ASTM standard. However,
the exposure to a virus follows a
different methodology using the
Ansell Dynamic Testing Device to
simulate the reality of daily usage.
 | | Ansell Dynamic Testing Device
|
Viral penetration has been assessed on a ‘pass
or fail’ basis.
Taking into account Ansell’s recommendations for surgical gloves (i.e. to be changed
after one hour maximum usage) and for
examination gloves (to be changed after 30
minutes maximum usage), the following
exposure times have been used:
for surgical gloves: testing occurred after 0, 30, 60 and 120 minutes of exposure
for examination gloves: testing occurred after 0, 30 and 60 minutes of exposure.
Twenty key medical gloves (surgical and
examination) have been tested but the vinyl
examination gloves were excluded because
scientific evidence shows that vinyl’s protection barrier is relatively weak compared to
other glove materials.